About Our Company
About Our Company
Royal Bank of Canada
Our Locations
Community Involvement »
Our History
Our Values
Press Room »
Contact Us
Home - Contact Us - Search
Press Room
PR Contacts
Press Releases
Market Commentary
Analysts
Management
www.rbcdain.com Personal Investing Personal Investing Career Center Career Center Institutional Investing Instituional Investing Our Company Our Company

Weekly Market Commentary

May 14, 2004
Ed Schuller
Senior Investment Strategist
(800) 445-8312
edward.schuller@rbcdain.com


A Year of Living Dangerously


These are certainly interesting times. Just a short year ago the markets had embarked on an upward ride that brought back memories of earlier rallies and put most investors in rather pleasant moods. Today's trend, as measured by this past week's market performance, is to worry about everything and wonder how much worse it will get. A year ago, there was still another 25 basis point drop in the federal funds target rate in the offing, while today thoughts are turned to when, and how far, the Fed will raise rates. A year ago, there were thoughts of a quick resolution to the Iraqi conflict and the notion that oil prices would decline once the military action was concluded. This past week, with new and unsettling revelations on the situation in Iraq coming to light daily, the price of oil reached a 21-year high on Friday of $41 per barrel.

In fact, even as energy futures stalled a bit on Friday morning, coming under some pressure from profit taking, dealers in London saw the potential for a rally through the $42 level. Hedge fund buying coupled with short covering helped to spike prices levels through the $41 level on Thursday, setting the stage for the higher move to a record high on Friday. Many observers felt that traders would not want to be short over the weekend, which could help another upward push early next week. There was little reaction to the announcement on Thursday by OPEC president Yusgiantoro of Indonesia who joined the call of Saudi oil minister Ali Naimi for an increase in OPEC production to cap ever-increasing oil prices. There appears to be little consensus inside the cartel, however, and many traders view the potential of a substantial increase in output as highly unlikely.

The Nasdaq composite, which was in the midst of its own surge one short year ago, continued on its current downward trend. Earnings reports from both Cisco Systems and Dell Inc. this week could not stem the tide. In fact, many analysts on Wall Street found some negative news in both company's releases. While Cisco reported April quarter pro-forma earnings of $0.19 vs. $0.15 the prior year, and cash flow of $2.4 billion, a quarterly record for the company, we believe the announced 20% sequential increase in inventory was a cause for much of the concern. Some view this as a potential risk if demand expectations are not matched, creating a situation where the company is vulnerable to slowdowns. Dell noted a decline in margins due to rising component costs and intensified pricing. In fact, this was the fourth consecutive quarter-to-quarter decline in margins for the company. Some analysts found the company interesting, but the stock fairly valued and somewhat un-compelling as a new investment.

Following the prior week's FOMC meeting, bond market participants appeared to find their market un-compelling, as the spectre of higher rates loomed over the trading pits. Except for those making day trades on moves that were news or dollar related, we believe many credit investors seemed to be content sitting on the sidelines waiting for the dust to settle (or the Fed to hike the target rate). There wasn't a lot of consistency in the week's economic releases to help smooth things out, either. Good news came from the April trade price index, which rose 0.2%, below the expectation of 0.4% and March's revised index of 0.8%. Also in the positive column was initial jobless claims report for the week ended May 8, which rose by 13,000. The four-week moving average now stands at 335,750, down 7,750 from last week, and at the lowest point since the recovery in the labor market began. April industrial production surged 0.8%, almost triple the expectation of a 0.3% rise, and well above the 0.1% decline the prior month. Gains were pretty much across market and industry groups. The negative news came from a number of areas. First off was the March trade deficit, which rose $3.9 billion to $46.0 billion, higher than the estimate of $43 billion. The report indicates that U.S. consumers continue to purchase foreign goods which, coupled with the continued weak dollar may continue to amplify this number in the coming months, in our opinion. The April PPI rose 0.7%, driven mainly by surging energy prices. Retail sales for April fell by 0.5%, reversing the previous month's trend. The May University of Michigan consumer sentiment survey was flat at 94.2, equalling last month's level. Expectations were for a rise to 96. Finally, in the neither fish nor fowl category, was the April CPI, which rose by 0.2%, under the estimate of a 0.3% rise. However, the core CPI was up 0.3% for the month, exceeding the expectation of a 0.2% rise. Overall, the core CPI is up 1.8% year over year, at the upper end of the Fed's target range of 1%-2%.

In a week that saw the Dow drop 127 points on Monday, and then experience a wild ride on Wednesday where the index declined by 167 points before staging a 193 point rally to finish the day in the black by 25 points, the Nasdaq composite and S&P 500 were content to finish near the point at which they started. The old trader's adage of "sell in May and go away" seems to be holding true, as the growing geopolitical news appears to be weighing on many investors. With the next FOMC meeting more than a month away, the focus next week will no doubt be on energy prices, and where (and when) the peak will be. External forces will continue to buffet both oil and the markets in general, adding to the uncertainty that has already reached a stage that could be best described as palpable—which seems to be exactly the right place for a market that we believe gives the impression of being dangerously on the edge.


The author is employed by RBC Dain Rauscher Inc., a securities broker-dealer with principal offices located in Minnesota, USA.

RBC Dain Rauscher Inc. makes a market in the securities of Intel Corporation and may act as principal with regard to sales or purchases of this security.

In the event that this is a compendium report (covers more than six subject companies) RBC Capital Markets (RBC CM) may choose to provide specific disclosures for the subject companies by reference. To access these disclosures, clients should refer to http://rbc2.bluematrix.com/bluematrix/Disclosure or send a request to RBC CM Research Publishing, 60 South 6th Street, Mail Stop P16, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402.

Explanation Of RBC Capital Markets Rating System
Definitions Of Rating Categories
An analyst's sector is the universe of companies for which the analyst provides research coverage. Accordingly, the rating assigned to a particular stock represents the analyst's view of how that stock will perform over the next 12 months relative to the analyst's sector, but does not attempt to provide the analyst's view of how the stock will perform relative to: (i) all companies that may actually exist in the company's sector, or (ii) any broader market index.
Ratings:
Top Pick (TP): Represents analyst's best ideas in Outperform category; expected to significantly outperform sector over 12 months; provides best risk-reward ratio; approximately 10% of analyst's recommendations.
Outperform (O): Expected to materially outperform sector average over 12 months.
Sector Perform (SP): Returns expected to be in line with sector average over 12 months.
Underperform (U): Returns expected to be materially below sector average over 12 months.
Risk Qualifiers:
Average Risk (Avg): Volatility and risk expected to be comparable to sector; average revenue and earnings predictability; no significant cash flow/financing concerns over coming 12-24 months; and/or fairly liquid.
Above Average Risk (AA): Volatility and risk expected to be above sector; below average revenue and earnings predictability; may not be suitable for a significant class of individual equity investors; may have negative cash flow; and/or low market cap or float.
Speculative (Spec): Risk consistent with venture capital; low public float; potential balance sheet concerns; and/or risk of being delisted.

Our Research Ratings Legend can be viewed at www.rbccm.com/researchratings.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST

The material contained herein has been prepared from sources and data that RBC Dain Rauscher Inc. believes to be reliable and is intended solely for the use of RBC Dain Rauscher Inc. clients. However, this material does not purport to be a complete statement of all material facts related to any company, industry, or security mentioned, and RBC Dain Rauscher Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy and completeness of this material. Further, the material and opinions provided herein are not intended as personalized investment advice. The investments and opinions presented do not constitute an individual recommendation and may not be suitable for individual clients. RBC Dain Rauscher Inc. urges each of its clients to assess the material presented in light of such client's specific circumstances, which may include, among other things, an evaluation of the client's investment goals, risk tolerance, age, income, liquidity needs and overall portfolio allocation. This material is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute, and should not be considered as an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell securities or commodities, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under applicable securities laws. The opinions and estimates expressed herein reflect the judgments of the author(s) as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. RBC Dain Rauscher Inc. is not obligated to continue to offer opinions, estimates or other information regarding any company or security referenced herein, or to update any opinions, estimates or information contained in this material. Accordingly, the opinions, estimates and information contained herein may not reflect events occurring after the publication date.

RBC Dain Rauscher Inc., its officers, directors, subsidiaries, affiliates, and/or employees may from time to time have a corporate finance relationship with, and/or hold long or short positions in securities (or derivatives thereof) publicly or privately issued by companies mentioned in this report, and may sell or buy such securities for their own accounts or related accounts without notice to RBC Dain Rauscher Inc. clients. Any Canadian recipient of this report that is not a Designated Institution in Ontario or a Sophisticated Purchaser in Quebec (or similar permitted institutional purchaser in any other province) and that wishes further information regarding, or to effect any transaction in, any of the securities discussed in this report should contact and place orders with RBC Dominion Securities Inc., which, without in any way limiting the foregoing, accepts responsibility for this report and its dissemination in Canada.

Copyright © 2003 by RBC Dain Rauscher Inc. All rights reserved.



Glossary   -   Contents   -   Find Us

Privacy Statement   -   Terms & Conditions   -   ©2002 - 2007 RBC Dain Rauscher, a division of RBC Capital Markets Corporation, Member NYSE/FINRA/SIPC